Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Application Performance Management’

For those who was not able to attend to the WhatsUp Gold Application Perfomance Monitor (APM) Technical Overview training,

please refer to the attached video above.

Enjoy it and stay tune for more video from us.

For further information, please contact us or visit to our website on http://www.e-spincorp.com

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

This video special for those who did not able to come for the training

Enjoy and understand it ! =)

Stay tune for our E-Spin WhatsUp Gold Application Perfomance Monitor (APM) Technical Overview video

For more information/inquiry, please do not hesitate to contact us or visit our website on http://www.e-spincorp.com

Read Full Post »

E-SPIN WhatsUp Gold v16.3.1

World wide leading network, servers, applications performance monitoring (APM), end-to-end system solutions WhatsUp Gold launching new release 16.3.1 with extensive regional language support and address range of bug report from 16.3.

As traditional of E-SPIN practice, E-SPIN will organizing end user and reseller seminar to educate customer and partners the changes and new features indepth.

End user 16.3.1 Product Overview, Technical Overview & Live Demo : 11th August 2015

For ticket reservation : https://goo.gl/NKeSso

Reseller 16.3.1 Product Overview, Technical Overview & Live Demo : 12th August 2015

For ticket reservation : https://goo.gl/oMdlYo

WhatsUp Gold Features

Added Language Packs for the following languages:

  • Japanese
  • Chinese Simplified
  • Chinese Traditional
  • Russian
  • French
  • German
  • Italian
  • Spanish
  • Portuguese

Defect ID

Category

Issues

DEP-2402

User Interface

Corrected a UI issue with the installer that caused the dialogs to display incorrectly when Windows configuration is modified to appear larger or smaller.

DEP-2552

Installation

Corrected an issue in which the licensing software failed during the WhatsUp Gold install process on Windows 2012.

PFM-16540

Ports

Corrected an issue in which high quantities of ports that lingered in the TIME_WAIT state for the Service Bus port (9713) exhausting the available ports on the system.

WUG-7805

Devices

Corrected an issue that caused WhatsUp Gold to lock up when end users attempted to access Device Status for a device to which he/she does not have the proper permissions to view.

WUG-8297

Monitors

Corrected an issue in which the conditions for a new WinEvent Passive Monitor were not saved successfully when two “Event ID” conditions, one based on a “<=” value and one based on “>=”, were used.

WUG-8397

Monitors

Corrected an issue in which WMI formatted active monitors were not logging payload messages to the State Change Timeline.

WUG-8417

Monitors

Corrected an issue that caused the Ping Active Monitor(s) to incorrectly report DOWN and “Ping failed. Error=Invalid access to memory location” to be logged in the State Change Timeline.

WUG-8959

Reports

Corrected an issue that caused the Active Monitor Outage and Down Summary for Quarterly reports to show an inaccurate Down count of 0.

WUG-12538

Monitors

Corrected an issue in which an SNMP Active Monitor for Rate Change set to Down would incorrectly change to Up when the configuration dialog was reopened.

WUG-12797

Monitors

Corrected an issue in which a WMI Formatted active monitor using the %ActiveMonitor.Payload percent variable was not returning values.

WUG-12811

Syslog Message Export

Corrected an issue in which Syslog messages exported from WhatsUp Gold to Excel were not including the entire payload.

WUG-12963

User Interface

Corrected an issue in which the ‘Message’ column of the State Change Timeline was not correctly displaying double byte characters when using a Chinese operating system.

WUG-12983/14930

Reports

Corrected an issue causing an error to be generated if the start and end times selected are identical when exporting the Quarterly Availability Summary report to PDF with live links.

WUG-13767

Devices

Corrected an issue in which dynamic groups of devices based on IP address ranges fail due to IPv6 addresses.

WUG-13890

Devices

Corrected an issue which generated an error when attempting to view device properties for a device with a high number of IP addresses.

WUG-14120/WVRT-2072

Reports

Corrected an issue in which VMWare Current Utilization dashboard reports were available for all devices. This report only applies to standalone VMware Hosts and vCenter Servers.

WUG-14786

Monitors

Corrected an issue which could cause the Ping Active Monitor to fail and generate the following error: Ping x.x.x.x failed. Error=Win32 error = 11050.

WUG-14825

User Interface

Corrected a UI pagination issue that occurred when monitoring more than 500 devices in WhatsUp Gold.

WUG-14878

User Interface

Corrected a UI issue that prevented the entire ‘Comment’ column from being displayed or the hover text from appearing in the Active Monitors tab of the Device Properties dialog.

WUG-14897

Discovery

Corrected an issue that caused a Cisco L3 Router to be discovered as a Wireless LAN Controller.

Multiple

Internet Explorer 11

Corrected issues related to compatibility with Internet Explorer 11.

Read Full Post »

Graph credit Extrahop

What are the main factors that can contradict with your application performance? What drives you to find solution with Application Performance Management (APM)?

This 5 top factors list will cover the impacts of the application, to the surrounding and the network, to the people behind those applications. All of these factors should be considered when managing application performance to tackle the issue quickly.

1. APPLICATION COMPLEXITY

Application complexity is one of the biggest factors impacting application performance. Today’s services and applications, specifically  those conveyed via the Web, are a montage of components that come from various places such as data center, cloud, and third-party.  Multiple moving parts must be execute in the manner to provide a great experience for end-user, while the customer or employee looking at a browser window sees a single application. Maybe the app server and Web server are doing fine, but  user experience will suffer if the database is staggering. Being able to measure and keep tabs on all those moving parts is the test and requires an APM tool that can provide a view into the performance of all the parts, not just individual components.

2. APPLICATION DESIGN

Performance goals need to be characterized when applications are specified, in parallel with the information of the environment the applications will run in. A number of times improvement is left out and applications are monitored, analyzed and being repair after released into production. This never works as well as when performance is one of the key goals of the application design before a line of code is written.

In addition, the factor too affects application performance today which poorly optimized code and infrastructure, such as sub-optimal SQL queries and poorly configured network infrastructure. All of these problems can be hard to cater, and the emphasis on DevOps processes can cause multiply quickly by increasing the rate of change in the data center. Hence, it is important to capably tool the data center to monitor and report on all aspects of a deployed application using code level instrumentation, EURT and network performance tools, and traditional IT infrastructure monitoring solutions.

3. APPLICATION TESTING

Nowadays, applications are generally developed in simulation labs with no performance test on live networks. Before applications are displayed, transport in highly distributed network architectures today should be monitored and optimized. Fault testing of the application in the live production environment impacts performance. Tied to that is for developers and testers to have a clear understanding of the non-functional performance criteria.

4. THE NETWORK

The network on which the application is used impacts performance greatly, in particular for mobile and cloud. Inconsistent bandwidth, high jitters  increased latency and packet loss all work to decrease application performance. While it might not be able to  cloud networks or control mobile, by building and apps test with these network conditions in mind the issue can be comprehend. Before the network impacts are felt by users, this will gives organizations the opportunity to optimize app performance .

5. PEAK USAGE

How the application will be used? How many people will continuously use it and for what kind? This will affect application performance as well as give corresponding application architecture and its scaling assumptions that go into its design and deployment. This lack of understanding actual user transactions and performance itself can stir the performance during the critical peak usage period. Applications should be able to cater during peak usage to deliver better user experience. It should be able to downshift to preserve resources when demand is low. To make this thing work, , at a minimum APM technology should provide a governor or feedback loop to the app regarding end user experience and internal app/infra operations.


You may also be interested in:

1. Does Application Performance Management (APM) Critical To Network Health?

2. Competencies in Application Performance Monitor (APM) Solutions

3. E-SPIN Cascade Pilot PE (formerly Cace Pilot) Technical Live Demo video

4. E-SPIN Cascade Pilot PE (formerly Cace Pilot) Technical Overview Video

5. The Silent Killer: Downtime

Read Full Post »

Illustration credit by Matt Zanderigo

A business will greatly affected as application performance is poor, either bad review in company brand or resulting in lost revenues as customers could not achieved full transactions or leave the process in disappointment. The responsibility of IT Operations teams are often crucial in application performance and are held accountable for finding the root cause of performance declination. Though, it will be more difficult gaining the eyesight as IT surroundings become more complex and dynamic.

There are many factors that contribute to accumulating IT complexity and dynamism. Before this, IT surroundings were adequately static, and configuration management database (CMDB) is used for registering and accounted every piece of the IT infrastructure. The interference of older performance monitoring techniques with agile development practices give perpetual recurring application changes. Handling much more data travelling, application infrastructure is widely distributed and modular for faster speeds. Last but not least, the trending in portability and the IT consumerization brings restrictive control over employee’s devices and operating systems for the IT organizations.  In the nick of time, wired systems are greatly give better influence of all health and performance information for modern applications.

An approach to application performance management can provide IT departments visibility in what they need to prevent or hastily recover performance problems before affecting the business. Various application components interact with one another over the network hence giving application performance management is critical for the network health and performance.

Read Full Post »

The Anatomy of APM – 4 Foundational Elements to a Successful Strategy

Illustration credit Larry Dragich

Contrasting capabilities is a vital part of  evaluation when we appraise application performance monitoring (APM) solutions. However it can create deceives.  There are many features that provide by application performance monitoring solutions which is not a crucial part for the user. Frequently the solutions are expensive, complex, and hard to implement in what we want. Though sometimes there are not high priority in which the features included in the affordable products. The most important thing is how nearly each solutions can fits your needs rather than determine by cost and features of a product.

What are your goals? Before you explore particular capabilities in solutions you are assess to, here are some of the priority you need to clarify with:

Goal Priority
Ensuring the availability and performance of critical applications
Gain visibility over the entire IT service  that supports an application
Reducing user complaints
Improving MTTR time
Improving reporting (out of the box and customizable)
Eliminating alert overload and time spent unnecessarily on low-priority issues
Meeting SLA goals
Controlling IT costs
Other:

The steps:

1. Identify your highest priorities

2. Map highest priorities to specific product capabilities

3. Select better solution

For example, if improving MTTR time is the highest priority, you should look for monitoring products with strong capabilities:

  • Monitoring, alerting and reporting on an application’s entire IT service
  • Allowing you to define critical application dependencies so you can find the root cause quickly
  • Presenting one unified dashboard so you can see problems quickly and drill down to the root cause
  • Letting you customize automated actions in response to specific conditions so issues can be detected and repairs made without delay
  • Providing out-of-the-box reports so you can easily track metrics such as MTTR rates over time

For reducing user complaints as a top priority, you’d need the first four of the above capabilities plus end user monitoring to alert and report on user experience’s effect of web application performance.

This exercise gives a better position to find a solution of documenting your prioritized goals and mapping them to product capabilities to prevent dissapointment.

Read Full Post »

 Meet Carol and Frank

A pain in the neck. A killer with a silencer mode, firing right at all the company productivity. Yes, it is what we called as downtime. The word is “utilize” to refer to time when a system is unavailable. As known as outrage duration, the word too refers to a period of time that a system fails to provide or perform their primary function. The term is commonly applied to networks and servers, as far as concern the common reasons for unplanned noise are system failures for instance like crash or communication failures.

Firstly, the impact of downtime is business cost for enterprises with revenue models that depend solely on the data centers’ ability to deliver IT and networking services to customers – such as telecommunications service providers and e-commerce companies – downtime can be particularly costly, with the highest cost of a single event topping $1 million (more than $11,000 per minute) (Understanding the Cost of Data Center Downtime: An Analysis of the Financial Impact of Infrastructure Vulnerability).

Next, downtime impact the reputation and loyalty include lost business with customers (both short term and long term), employee time panning away to other tasks to get the IT systems operating again, employee overtime expenses, the value of lost data, emergency maintenance fees specifically if it occurs during off hours and additional repair costs that may go on even after service has been restored, and many more.

The final impact as illustrates at the picture above is the employee productivity. It can be measured in terms of the salaries, wages and benefits of workers that are made neglected by system downtime. After a downtime event, investigative actions are often required to correct the damage.

To prevent from the outcome of downtime, an application performance management(APM) is a must for an organization to need it. APM strives to detect and diagnose application performance problems to maintain an expected level of service as well to counterpart quickly before downtime arouse. With WhatsUp Application Performance Monitor, it can unifies systems, network, and application monitoring – and gives the capabilities to ensure that application performance meets user expectations and business priorities.It provides the full insight and customization to find and assess the impact of issues, isolate the cause, and restore performance levels.

For more information on Whatsup Application Performance Monitor, please don’t hesitate to talk with us.

You may also be interested in:

1. Whatsup Gold Application Performance Management (APM) Insights

2. SIEM Security Concerns

3. Trends for Cyber Security in 2013

4. How to instant session hijack other people Facebook and Twitter user account?

5. Protect Business From Cyber Attacks

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »